Rather than an alternative of presenting factual analysis of the case, personal inabilities were proclaimed, leading to the German man being mortified and offended. We need professionals to step in and take the roles from us, which results in us being cast aside. I think that by having the initial parties involved instead of being pushed to the side, society will be more concerned to make sure that everyone is given a fair, equal, and consistent resolution to a conflict.
Secondly we segregate people based on their physical attributes such as race, gender, and sex. The conflicts are repressed in such a manner where there is no attention given to the victim, revolving the concentrated attention to the background of the criminal Christie,pg.
This however is not the case, as the Supreme Court of Canada for example; does not allow the directly involved parties to attend their own court hearings Christie, The defense lawyer had chose to not discuss the facts of his course of action, but rather his lawyer had chosen to argue that his client had lacked any capabilities to organize that would required for the role, presenting how the defendant was too socially deficient and incapable to perform the actions of such a role Christie,pg.
The author, Nils Christie, is reasonable for making these declarations. Most offenders after committing crimes do not want to see the victims or their families that they affected.
The absolute fundamental purpose is to maintain social control and to provide protection of all forms of conflicts to those who inhabit within their society.
Nevertheless, obtaining a lawyer in which will provide services that would be approved by the individual would require excessive amounts of expenses, whereas those without would be dependent on Legal Aid, showing a clear distinction between lower and higher classes during the interaction of the western legal system Vago and Nelson,pg.
The most influential consequence that we experience is depersonalization as Christie said. Conflicts are the property of those whom had initiated them; therefore the property of the conflict should be taken out from the legal professionals to be restituted to those established it.
This is occurs when victims in criminal law lose their right to participate in their own legal issues Christie, pg. Is it not what somebody deserves? Christie expresses that these conflicts are eliminated from the involved parties, rather than being used to benefit the individuals.
The participant is presented to be a double victim, as they are portrayed as a victim via the offender but also a victim of the state due to the state having denied them their full right to participate in their own conflict Christie, The legal system aspires to provide justice to any social, economic and political conflict.
This segregation has many consequences on society as a whole. This process proves to fail as society is faced with another obstruction, as it does not provide the principal aspirations of justice and protecting individuals from harm but to be more precise, the legal system is destructive in a way where it is both stealing conflicts and providing actual harm to those in society.
To have a case in which they are heard. People need to be able to interact face to face and have a more personal interaction. It would ensure that the neighborhood and state have the same set of shared values and goals that they are working towards to support social order.
However, if such an individual does not like the manner of handling of their case by the lawyer, the individual is free to obtain another legal representative. The segmentation in space is how we go through our daily lives and not recognizing any of the people we see as who they are but by what they do.
Instead of letting the state or professionals take over and say what they think has the most relevance to a case the court should hear the entire story from the victims point of view.
He elevates by alleging that this continuous process has been recognized to be detrimental to all of society.
These protective procedures for individuals in society have provided great discomfort rather than actually preventing harm, which is proved to be unnecessary and potentially provides long-term harm to society as a whole. Search Conflicts as Property - Critical Anaylsis In the article Conflicts as Property, written by Nils Christie, Christie states that conflicts in western society are the property of the involved parties and those legal conflicts have been immediately taken away from their possession Christie, Christie demonstrates that the legal procedure of such conflicts are being dissociated from their owners in which continues to remain.In an important paper written inthe criminologist Nils Christie gave us the idea of Conflicts as Property.
The idea was that highly industrialized/5(1). Excerpted and reprinted from Nils Christie (), "Conflicts as Property", and he proposes a remedy for this loss in a new court model for dealing with conflicts. Nils Christie shares his thoughts with society about his perception of seeing conflicts as property, as well as the ways in which the legal system and individuals involved in conflicts are affected.3/5(3).
It is an influential article written by the criminologist Nils Christie in to be Christies thesis in on Critical Summary of Conflicts as Property. Nils Christie shares his thoughts with society about his perception of seeing conflicts as property, as well as the ways in which the legal system 4/4(2).
Nils Christie, Conflict as Property with Christie in the perception that conflicts can be viewed as property. Christie’s view as necessary or essential is.Download